Guided editorial process for strategic and user-focused content

Global communication team of a leading technology company

When hundreds of experts across markets contribute content, alignment quickly becomes a challenge. The communication team saw the need for more guidance – helping contributors focus on what truly matters: user relevance and strategic impact.

The challenge

With over 1,000 experts creating content across regions, the company wasn’t short on ideas or effort – but on alignment. Content was produced everywhere, but not always consistently. Teams used different tools and processes, responsibilities overlapped, and without clear governance, things felt more reactive than strategic.

The result? Brilliant people working in silos, unclear handovers, and a growing need for a shared foundation that connects strategy, storytelling and user focus.

Our approach

Together, we developed a centralised submission and prioritisation process that re-established the global communication team’s role in steering content topics and priorities.

This structure helps contributors focus on strategically relevant, user-centred stories while enabling global comms to drive thought leadership:

  • developed a transparent scoring system to prioritise strategically relevant content

  • embedded target group and impact data directly in the submission step

  • introduced a feedback and qualification loop through the editorial board

  • created user-oriented templates to support storytelling and tone

  • guided teams in selecting topics aligned with audience needs and business goals

The result

A guided, structured process that brings clarity and purpose.
Teams now submit higher-quality, user-centred content that fits strategic priorities, speaks with one voice and reduces duplication across markets. The global communication team can now steer topics centrally, ensuring thought leadership and strategic alignment across all content.

Deep dive

The editorial process

To bring more clarity and alignment, we introduced a central editorial process. Instead of every team doing their own thing, content planning and prioritisation now happens together.

This shift didn’t mean control from the top – it meant shared focus. By planning together, the teams can align global goals with local needs, reduce overlap, and create more space for meaningful content.

The result: a scalable approach that supports governance without becoming a bottleneck – and more flexibility for everyone involved.

Key editorial steps include:

  • Content submission: authors upload proposals based on targeted keywords and audience insights.

  • Prioritisation: content is ranked by the editorial team based on strategic impact.

  • Production: priority content is enhanced and distributed across platforms.

  • Amplification: content is expanded through predictive data.

  • Impact tracking: regular analysis sessions assess performance and foster continuous improvement.A central editorial process – shared focus, better flow

Curious how this could look in your organisation?
View more case studies
Diagram of a workflow with phases: Prioritization, Production, Amplification, Tracking, Submission, with illustrations of people collaborating and data points.